From graywyvern@hotmail.com Wed Oct 11 18:29:01 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 12 Oct 2000 01:29:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 5033 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 01:29:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 Oct 2000 01:29:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ei.egroups.com) (10.1.2.114) by mta3 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2000 01:29:00 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: graywyvern@hotmail.com Received: from [10.1.10.113] by ei.egroups.com with NNFMP; 12 Oct 2000 01:29:03 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 01:28:54 -0000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: na nei Message-ID: <8s344m+n8vo@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 213 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 209.176.48.28 From: "michael helsem" --- In lojban@egroups.com, "Jorge Llambias" wrote: li'o > > I can't think of any context where {nei} would be useful. > le mlatu cu cusku lu dei jitfa li'u gi'eku'i na nei lu mi tcica li'u