From graywyvern@hotmail.com Wed Oct 11 18:29:01 2000
Return-Path: <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 12 Oct 2000 01:29:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 5033 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 01:29:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 Oct 2000 01:29:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ei.egroups.com) (10.1.2.114) by mta3 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2000 01:29:00 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: graywyvern@hotmail.com
Received: from [10.1.10.113] by ei.egroups.com with NNFMP; 12 Oct 2000 01:29:03 -0000
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 01:28:54 -0000
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: na nei
Message-ID: <8s344m+n8vo@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <F135pneeFUtLch9wPiy00001657@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 213
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 209.176.48.28
From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>

--- In lojban@egroups.com, "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@h...> wrote:
li'o
> 
> I can't think of any context where {nei} would be useful.
> 

le mlatu cu cusku lu dei jitfa li'u gi'eku'i na nei lu mi tcica li'u