From xod@sixgirls.org Wed Oct 11 18:34:03 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 12 Oct 2000 01:34:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 12580 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 01:34:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 Oct 2000 01:34:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO erika.sixgirls.org) (209.208.150.50) by mta1 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2000 01:34:00 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by erika.sixgirls.org (8.11.0+3.3W/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e9C1Xws16835 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 21:33:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 21:33:58 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: na nei In-Reply-To: <8s344m+n8vo@eGroups.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself le bebna cu talsa la maikl. I am not sure how to say "only..." for the above sentence. On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, michael helsem wrote: > --- In lojban@egroups.com, "Jorge Llambias" wrote: > li'o > > > > I can't think of any context where {nei} would be useful. > > > > le mlatu cu cusku lu dei jitfa li'u gi'eku'i na nei lu mi tcica li'u ----- It takes a lot of work to realize how little work it takes to achieve Slack.