From richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com Wed Oct 11 22:33:06 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 12 Oct 2000 05:33:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 20536 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 05:33:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 Oct 2000 05:33:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO latimer.mail.uk.easynet.net) (195.40.1.40) by mta3 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2000 05:33:05 -0000 Received: from rrbcurnow.freeuk.com (tnt-9-96.easynet.co.uk [195.40.198.96]) by latimer.mail.uk.easynet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E156E53676 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:33:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from richard by rrbcurnow.freeuk.com with local (Exim 2.02 #2) id 13jTk2-00004J-00 for lojban@egroups.com; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 22:48:50 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 22:48:50 +0100 To: Lojban List Subject: Is va'e a valid cmavo? Message-ID: <20001011224850.A184@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com> Reply-To: Richard Curnow Mail-Followup-To: Lojban List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i-nntp From: Richard Curnow I've noticed the cmavo va'e (scale selbri) is discussed in chapter 18 of the Reference Grammar. It isn't referenced in either of the cmavo listings I've downloaded. Which is right? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard P. Curnow rpc@myself.com Weston-super-Mare United Kingdom http://go.to/richard.curnow/