From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Thu Oct 12 09:27:01 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 12 Oct 2000 16:27:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 8298 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 16:27:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 Oct 2000 16:27:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO c9.egroups.com) (10.1.2.66) by mta3 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2000 16:27:00 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Received: from [10.1.10.119] by c9.egroups.com with NNFMP; 12 Oct 2000 16:27:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:26:59 -0000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: years & numbers Message-ID: <8s4ooj+9vnk@eGroups.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 460 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79 From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" {ci [lo] nanca} or better {nanca li ci}?? {le ci nanca} - {le nanca be li ci}? {lo nanca xirma} - x2-default=1 {loi nanca be li ci be'o finpe} (it doesn't work with {crisa} which would give a German fishery term :-) {lo nanca be li paxa be'o nixli} (le nixli cu nanca li paxa) {lo nixli co nanca li paxa} or (worse?) {lo paxa [bo] nanca nixli} if not (!!) {le paxa nanca bo nixli} (what at least is grammatical correct: the 16 girls of the year). .aulun.