From araizen@newmail.net Thu Oct 12 15:25:44 2000
Return-Path: <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 12 Oct 2000 22:25:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 12876 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 22:25:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 Oct 2000 22:25:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mo.egroups.com) (10.1.1.34) by mta3 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2000 22:25:44 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: araizen@newmail.net
Received: from [10.1.2.207] by mo.egroups.com with NNFMP; 12 Oct 2000 22:25:44 -0000
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 22:25:39 -0000
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: New lujvo definitions in file area
Message-ID: <8s5dp3+deoe@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <062401c03449$813ba2c0$22191bc1@rus.ger.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 919
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 62.0.182.135
From: "Adam Raizen" <araizen@newmail.net>

"Daniel Gudlat" wrote:

> > ga'ormolsna closed+mouth+sound: consonant:
> 
> I don't like that one at all. For one thing (and I know I may be 
going
> down the picky route here) only one consonant is pronounced with a
> closed mouth (m), and to me, "humming" is the most plausible parse 
for
> this, in that it was the first to come to mind.

How about consonants being "jaksna" (narrow+sound) (sance lo jarki), 
since a consonant is a sound producted when some part of the mouth is 
narrowed. (s1 is a consonant produced at narrow place (of mouth) 
j1=s2, narrow by standard j3 (j2 default)) That way the x2 could 
differential between labials, dentals, velars, etc.

Similar, "vowel" could be "gansna" (sance lo ganra) (s1 is a vowel 
produced at broad place (of mouth) g1=s2, broad by standard g3 (g2 
default)). Likewise, x2 to specify front/back vowels and x3 I guess 
for high/low vowels.

co'o mi'e adam




