From xod@sixgirls.org Wed Oct 18 11:23:20 2000
Return-Path: <xod@sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 18 Oct 2000 18:23:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 27837 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2000 18:21:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 18 Oct 2000 18:21:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO erika.sixgirls.org) (209.208.150.50) by mta1 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2000 18:21:17 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by erika.sixgirls.org (8.11.0+3.3W/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e9IILGo20639 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:21:16 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:21:16 -0400 (EDT)
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: vrusi tanru
In-Reply-To: <13.c36b58c.271f3d71@aol.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0010181418350.20597-100000@erika.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 pycyn@aol.com wrote:

> It looks like rampant literalism is loose again (much as I hate to accuse 
> maikl of this). Remember, the best tanru/lujvo... is vivid and shocking and 
> catchy, in particular NOT a definition. These puppies used to be called 
> metaphors for a good reason. Be crafty, not correct.



I'd appreciate it if you'd expound upon this, providing examples as well.



-----
It takes a lot of work to realize how little work it takes 
to achieve Slack.


