From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Sun Oct 22 14:04:29 2000
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 22 Oct 2000 21:04:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 9052 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2000 21:04:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 22 Oct 2000 21:04:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mo.egroups.com) (10.1.1.34) by mta1 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2000 21:04:28 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.2.27] by mo.egroups.com with NNFMP; 22 Oct 2000 21:04:28 -0000
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:04:18 -0000
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: RE:literalism
Message-ID: <8svkoi+gofs@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.1001022170459.17089H-100000@locke.ccil.org>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 270
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>

--- In lojban@egroups.com, John Cowan <cowan@c...> wrote:

> Me, I like "Konstantinopolitanischerdudelsackspf
eifenmachengesellschaft".

Pretty fancy, but it should be: "Konstantinopolitanische
Dudelsackpfeifenmachergesellschaft" instead to be grammatical :-)

.aulun.