From slobin@ice.ru Mon Oct 30 05:43:47 2000
Return-Path: <slobin@ice.ru>
X-Sender: slobin@ice.ru
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 30 Oct 2000 13:43:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 1707 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2000 13:43:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 30 Oct 2000 13:43:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO feast.ice.ru) (213.128.193.50) by mta1 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2000 13:43:46 -0000
Received: from localhost (slobin@localhost) by feast.ice.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id QAA10535 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:43:44 +0300
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:43:44 +0300 (MSK)
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Another morphology question
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.1001027074907.4812A-100000@locke.ccil.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010301640360.10520-100000@feast.ice.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@ice.ru>

On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, John Cowan wrote:

> > Is sequence of vovels that does not form valid diphtong possible?
> > In particular, is cmene {rafael} valid or it should be {rafa,el}?
> 
> The comma is always optional: "rafael" and "rafa,el" are the same name,
> not two different names.

Does that mean that any sequence of vovels is possible in valid lojban
text (eg in cmene or experimental cmavo), unlike consonants where a lot
of pairs are explicitely forbidden?

-- 
Cyril Slobin <slobin@ice.ru>


