From slobin@ice.ru Mon Oct 30 14:23:03 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: slobin@ice.ru X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 30 Oct 2000 22:23:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 1680 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2000 22:22:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 30 Oct 2000 22:22:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO feast.ice.ru) (213.128.193.50) by mta2 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2000 22:22:53 -0000 Received: from localhost (slobin@localhost) by feast.ice.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id BAA14180 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 01:22:52 +0300 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 01:22:51 +0300 (MSK) To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Another morphology question In-Reply-To: <39FDC46D.D7534EAD@reutershealth.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Cyril Slobin On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, John Cowan wrote: > > Let us consider some vovel pair that doesn't form lojban > > diphtong - for example, "ae". Is cmavo "xae" possible? > > No. > > > Is cmene "xaes" possible? > > Yes, and it is the same as "xa,es". Curiouser and curiouser... And what about fu'ivla? Something like "brodrxae"? -- Cyril Slobin