Subject: Re: [lojban] Another morphology question

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:44:23 -0500

Cyril Slobin wrote:

> Curiouser and curiouser... And what about fu'ivla? Something like
> "brodrxae"?

I am pretty sure that is not valid any more, although it may have been
valid at one time. Of course "xa'e" and "brodrxa'e" are perfectly all right.

-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein