From jcowan@reutershealth.com Mon Oct 30 14:43:49 2000
Return-Path: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 30 Oct 2000 22:43:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 4679 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2000 22:43:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 30 Oct 2000 22:43:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta3 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2000 22:43:48 -0000
Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA04456; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:44:31 -0500 (EST)
Sender: cowan@mail.reutershealth.com
Message-ID: <39FDF9C7.5540919@reutershealth.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:44:23 -0500
Organization: Reuters Health Information
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cyril Slobin <slobin@ice.ru>, "lojban@onelist.com" <lojban@egroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Another morphology question
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010310121090.14162-100000@feast.ice.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

Cyril Slobin wrote:

> Curiouser and curiouser... And what about fu'ivla? Something like
> "brodrxae"?

I am pretty sure that is not valid any more, although it may have been
valid at one time. Of course "xa'e" and "brodrxa'e" are perfectly all right.

-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein

