From b.gohla@gmx.de Tue Oct 31 08:24:07 2000
Return-Path: <b.gohla@gmx.de>
X-Sender: b.gohla@gmx.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 31 Oct 2000 16:24:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 6690 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2000 16:24:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 31 Oct 2000 16:24:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (194.221.183.20) by mta1 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2000 16:24:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 11367 invoked by uid 0); 31 Oct 2000 16:24:02 -0000
Received: from a921e.pppool.de (HELO linux) (213.6.146.30) by mail.gmx.net with SMTP; 31 Oct 2000 16:24:02 -0000
Reply-To: b.gohla@gmx.de
Organization: private site
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: re: calendrical names
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:23:40 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2]
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <00103117331700.01180@linux>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Bjoern Gohla <b.gohla@gmx.de>


coi rodo

to go this path of arbitraryness ad absurdum, why not state dates 
in terms of seconds counting from the Big Bang. 
after all the second is the SI base unit for time and thus most culturally
neutral, furthermore the universe is about the most universal frame of
reference one can have (BTW is this a tautology). 

co'omi'e .biorn.