From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Thu Nov 02 13:13:07 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 2 Nov 2000 21:13:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 7184 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2000 21:13:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Nov 2000 21:13:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hm.egroups.com) (10.1.10.45) by mta3 with SMTP; 2 Nov 2000 21:13:06 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Received: from [10.1.10.122] by hm.egroups.com with NNFMP; 02 Nov 2000 21:13:04 -0000 Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 21:13:03 -0000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: abstraction focus Message-ID: <8tslcv+qe99@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001102135743.00ae9100@127.0.0.1> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 815 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79 From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" --- In lojban@egroups.com, "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" wrote: > At 07:04 AM 11/02/2000 +0000, Alfred W. Tueting (T=FCting) wrote: > >Only recently discovered that the cmavo {ce'u} (abstraction focus) is > >not included in any of the lists I downloaded. > I'm not sure why not, since I just checked and it is in my lists as well = =3D=0D as=20 > in my local master copy of the lojban.org site, in all the cmavo and=20 > logdata3 files under ythe wordlist directory. The keyword is "lambda". >=20 > va'e, as mentioned by R Curnow a few weeks back, is not in the lists, and= =3D=0D =20 > we are trying to find out why. But I don't know of any others missing. Sorry, for unknown reason I downloaded a 1994 -version of the cmavo list wi= =3D=0D th still a couple of more cmavo missing :( (this was=20 not too long ago!). .aulun.