From slobin@ice.ru Fri Nov 03 04:28:15 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: slobin@ice.ru X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 3 Nov 2000 12:28:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 11210 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2000 12:28:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 3 Nov 2000 12:28:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO feast.ice.ru) (213.128.193.50) by mta2 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2000 12:28:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (slobin@localhost) by feast.ice.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id PAA13036 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:28:12 +0300 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:28:12 +0300 (MSK) To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] abstraction focus In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001102135743.00ae9100@127.0.0.1> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Cyril Slobin On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote: > va'e, as mentioned by R Curnow a few weeks back, is not in the lists, and > we are trying to find out why. But I don't know of any others missing. BTW, while designing lojban.vim I've compared both of the cmavo lists (dated 1994 and 1998) with the book and filtered out the list of free (unassigned) cmavo. There are 14 of them: bi'a bo'a bo'e bo'i bo'o bo'u ci'a ja'u ne'e po'a te'i zi'a zi'i zi'u Any comments to this list? Maybe I have missed something or listed some cmavo actually in use? -- Cyril Slobin