From slobin@ice.ru Thu Nov 16 04:36:48 2000
Return-Path: <slobin@ice.ru>
X-Sender: slobin@ice.ru
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 16 Nov 2000 12:36:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 24057 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2000 12:36:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 16 Nov 2000 12:36:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO feast.ice.ru) (213.128.193.50) by mta3 with SMTP; 16 Nov 2000 13:37:52 -0000
Received: from localhost (slobin@localhost) by feast.ice.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id PAA01697; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:35:56 +0300
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:35:56 +0300 (MSK)
To: michael helsem <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
Cc: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: missing cmavo [was: Re: [lojban] abstraction focus
In-Reply-To: <F139JmGzrLCCtgx8VUk00006133@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21L0.0011161531030.1652-100000@feast.ice.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@ice.ru>

On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, michael helsem wrote:

> as far as i can tell, there are only two unassigned: BI'A & CA'U.

{ca'u} is for "in front of" (location tense).

> others not on the cmavo list: BI'E (p.437 in the Red Book); CE'E (208); CE'U 
> (161); RE'U (228); VA'E (447).

Probably you are using an old cmavo list. There are (at least) two of
them walking around - 1994 and 1998 versions. Date is mentioned at the
very first line of both lists.

-- 
Cyril Slobin <slobin@ice.ru>


