From phma@oltronics.net Thu Nov 16 13:07:24 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@oltronics.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 16 Nov 2000 21:07:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 8137 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2000 21:07:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 16 Nov 2000 21:07:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oltronics.net) (204.213.85.8) by mta1 with SMTP; 16 Nov 2000 21:07:23 -0000 Received: from neofelis (root@localhost) by mail.oltronics.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA10523 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:36:13 -0500 X-BlackMail: 207.15.133.10, neofelis, , 207.15.133.10 X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 17:36:13(EST) on November 16, 2000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: missing cmavo [was: Re: [lojban] abstraction focus Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:06:00 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0011161607190X.20128@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Pierre Abbat On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, michael helsem wrote: >also ZI'A & ZI'U can be inferred from ZI'E (compound relative >clause connectors). If that were so, then {zi'o} would also be a compound relative clause connector, which it isn't. phma