From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Fri Nov 17 14:05:48 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 17 Nov 2000 22:05:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 2981 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2000 22:05:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 17 Nov 2000 22:05:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hh.egroups.com) (10.1.10.40) by mta1 with SMTP; 17 Nov 2000 22:05:47 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Received: from [10.1.10.111] by hh.egroups.com with NNFMP; 17 Nov 2000 22:05:47 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 22:05:44 -0000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: except the cat Message-ID: <8v4a3o+63dm@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: <200011171956.OAA16515@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 866 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79 From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" --- In lojban@egroups.com, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >2) {ku'a} designates the "intersection" of different sets: how can > >"roda" have an intersection with "another" set, since *including*=20 > >all types of sets? >=20 > I don't think you're clear on what intersection is. The intersection of > the total set ("roda") and any other set A is just the set A. The point > is merely emphasis. Okay, got it into the "wrong throat" :( since never had that stuff in schoo= =3D=0D l (99 years back). Now I see: "(le'i) roda ku'anai le'i mlatu" could work. .aulun. _________ s =E1rny=E9kot =EDrna lassan / a lass=FA d=E9lel=F6tt ... und langsam Schatten schreibt der / langsame Vormittag ...=20 and shadows written slowly / by a slow late morning's light... =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 (Mikl=F3s Radn=F3ti - Bor, 1944, tr. A.W. Tueting) http://www.fa-kuan.muc.de/RADNOTI.RXML