From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Nov 17 15:55:27 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 17 Nov 2000 23:55:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 1508 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2000 23:55:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 17 Nov 2000 23:55:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.240.174) by mta2 with SMTP; 17 Nov 2000 23:55:26 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 15:55:26 -0800 Received: from 200.42.118.81 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 23:55:25 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.42.118.81] To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: except the cat Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 23:55:25 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Nov 2000 23:55:26.0045 (UTC) FILETIME=[DB2688D0:01C050F1] From: "Jorge Llambias" la robin cusku di'e > >I'm not sure what you mean by "all the points where the two > >sets are not equal". Do you include points that are not in > >either set? If you do, then that is not XOR. > >No, I don't. Remember, one of the sets is roda, i.e. _everything_. Ok, I thought you were after a general definition. > >That does not seem to preclude {ku'anai} from meaning either > >XOR or the complement of the intersection. Both are suitable > >"other connections". > >Except that the implication is one of textual _correction_, i.e. "No, >you can't use ku'a there, that's incorrect". Yes, I read it with more context and that is what the Book appears to say. We'll just have to pull an interpretation. co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.