From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sun Nov 26 11:22:26 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_2); 26 Nov 2000 19:22:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 92712 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2000 19:22:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Nov 2000 19:22:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.240.134) by mta2 with SMTP; 26 Nov 2000 19:22:26 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 11:22:25 -0800 Received: from 200.42.116.112 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:22:25 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.42.116.112] To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Problematic entries in the lujvo list Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:22:25 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Nov 2000 19:22:25.0886 (UTC) FILETIME=[35885FE0:01C057DE] From: "Jorge Llambias" la aulun cusku di'e >x1 cu banli le ka jamna -> balkamjamna -> baljamna -> "grand in warring" >("gloriously warring") (At the risk of being chastised for invoking non-existing lujvo making rules...) I just can't see {banli le ka jamna} giving {balkamjamna}. It has to be {kamjamba'i} or simply {jamba'i}. That is not to say that {baljamna} is not a valid lujvo, but its expansion (to me) would be something like {banli je jamna}, not {banli le ka jamna}. co'o mi'e xorxes _____________________________________________________________________________________ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com