From phma@oltronics.net Tue Nov 28 11:26:11 2000
Return-Path: <phma@oltronics.net>
X-Sender: phma@oltronics.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_2); 28 Nov 2000 19:26:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 50887 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2000 19:26:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 Nov 2000 19:26:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oltronics.net) (204.213.85.8) by mta2 with SMTP; 28 Nov 2000 19:26:10 -0000
Received: from neofelis (root@localhost) by mail.oltronics.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA19115 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 14:26:07 -0500
X-BlackMail: 207.15.133.38, neofelis, <phma@oltronics.net>, 207.15.133.38
X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 14:26:07(EST) on November 28, 2000
To: Lojban List <lojban@egroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] cmavo prefixed onto type IV fu'ivla : to split or not to split?
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 14:17:16 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2]
Content-Type: text/plain
References: <20001127221311.B111@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
In-Reply-To: <20001127221311.B111@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <00112814260307.01050@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Richard Curnow wrote:
>If the word 'lastamina' is encountered in Lojban text, which of these
>ways is it supposed to be parsed ?
>
>lastamina : single type IV fu'ivla
>la stamina : cmavo + type IV fu'ivla

"la stamina". Similarly, "melongena" would break into "me longena" so I took the first "e"
out. But "kapsiku" (x1 is a chile/bell pepper/cayenne/paprika of
species/variety x2) doesn't break because "ps" is a non-initial cluster.

When I listed the nightshades, I said "starmoni" for "jimsonweed" to get a
non-initial "rm" in the word. Is "stramoni" a valid fu'ivla?

phma

