From richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com Tue Nov 28 14:52:28 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_2); 28 Nov 2000 22:52:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 40714 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2000 22:52:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 Nov 2000 22:52:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scrabble.freeuk.net) (212.126.144.6) by mta2 with SMTP; 28 Nov 2000 22:52:11 -0000 Received: from du-009-0246.freeuk.com ([212.126.152.246] helo=rrbcurnow.freeuk.com ident=root) by scrabble.freeuk.net with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 140tbd-0004uf-00 for lojban@egroups.com; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:52:10 +0000 Received: from richard by rrbcurnow.freeuk.com with local (Exim 2.02 #2) id 140syY-00003w-00 for lojban@egroups.com; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:11:46 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:11:46 +0000 To: Lojban List Subject: Two more type IV fu'ivla questions Message-ID: <20001128221146.A241@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com> Reply-To: Richard Curnow Mail-Followup-To: Lojban List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i-nntp From: Richard Curnow 1. In the online version of the Ref. Grammar there is a statement It is possible to have fu'ivla like ``spa'i'' that are five letters long, yet doesn't spa'i fail the slinku'i test, because (for example) baspa'i would be a valid lujvo (I leave the meaning to the reader's imagination :-) ) So is the first statement wrong? 2. Does Lojban make any use at all of CCV as a word on its own (e.g. spa)? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard P. Curnow rpc@myself.com Weston-super-Mare United Kingdom http://go.to/richard.curnow/