From phma@oltronics.net Tue Nov 28 21:26:55 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@oltronics.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_2); 29 Nov 2000 05:26:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 7050 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2000 05:26:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 29 Nov 2000 05:26:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oltronics.net) (204.213.85.8) by mta1 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2000 05:26:52 -0000 Received: from neofelis (root@localhost) by mail.oltronics.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA05677 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:26:49 -0500 X-BlackMail: 207.15.133.18, neofelis, , 207.15.133.18 X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 00:26:49(EST) on November 29, 2000 To: Lojban List Subject: Re: [lojban] Two more type IV fu'ivla questions Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:24:06 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: <4.3.2.7.2.20001128230337.00c24f00@127.0.0.1> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001128230337.00c24f00@127.0.0.1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0011290026440G.01050@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Pierre Abbat On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote: li'o >No. The shortest word ever proposed was "iglu", but I think we found a >situation where that would fail as well (iglu zbasu -> .i gluzbasu too >easily and I think there was another situation that was even worse in not >relying on careful stress to resolve.) Would a fu'ivla of form VCCV work if CC were not an initial pair? phma