From topaz@linkline.com Fri Dec 01 14:29:48 2000
Return-Path: <topaz@linkline.com>
X-Sender: topaz@linkline.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_2); 1 Dec 2000 22:29:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 4273 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2000 22:29:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 1 Dec 2000 22:29:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ml.egroups.com) (10.1.1.31) by mta2 with SMTP; 1 Dec 2000 22:29:45 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: topaz@linkline.com
Received: from [10.1.10.68] by ml.egroups.com with NNFMP; 01 Dec 2000 22:29:45 -0000
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 22:29:45 -0000
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: zoi gy. Good Morning! .gy.
Message-ID: <9098op+7065@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <52.41e7e38.275978cf@aol.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 435
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 63.205.143.86
From: "David Scriven" <topaz@linkline.com>

--- In lojban@egroups.com, pycyn@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 12/1/2000 12:31:43 PM Central Standard Time, 
> topaz@l... writes:
> 
> 
> > .a cercoi (?)
> > 
> 
> This is, alas, now a lujvo meaning something about morning deep 
(whatever 
> that may be -- nothing close to Good Morning comes to mind). In 
any case, it 
> is not a member of the class to which {coi} belongs.


Hmm... so why doesn't "coico'o" mean "deep goodbye"?