From graywyvern@hotmail.com Sat Dec 09 15:14:31 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_3); 9 Dec 2000 23:14:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 34075 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2000 23:14:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 9 Dec 2000 23:14:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.236.137) by mta3 with SMTP; 10 Dec 2000 00:15:36 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 11:26:11 -0800 Received: from 209.176.48.33 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 09 Dec 2000 19:26:10 GMT X-Originating-IP: [209.176.48.33] To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: RE: [lojban] Bringing it about that Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 19:26:10 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Dec 2000 19:26:11.0110 (UTC) FILETIME=[E3259460:01C06215] From: "michael helsem" >From: "And Rosta" li'o >nitcu, djica and above all >sisku, which makes sense only with a tu'a. is not TROCI CO KARGAU et al feasible? i don't see the difference between e.g. PLINI SISKU & SISKU LO PLINI for non-academic purposes... it seems to me that "sumti-raising" as a separate issue derives from NU LOGJI TERPA that is more GLIJBO than LOBYKAI... how often does this create a misunderstanding that isn't readily guessable from context? _____________________________________________________________________________________ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com