From phma@oltronics.net Sat Dec 09 15:38:09 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@oltronics.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_3); 9 Dec 2000 23:38:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 75668 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2000 23:38:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 9 Dec 2000 23:38:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oltronics.net) (204.213.85.8) by mta3 with SMTP; 10 Dec 2000 00:39:13 -0000 Received: from neofelis (root@localhost) by mail.oltronics.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA03455 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 18:38:05 -0500 X-BlackMail: 207.15.133.44, neofelis, , 207.15.133.44 X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 18:38:06(EST) on December 09, 2000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: fu'ivla tarmi Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:59:06 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0012091808170I.20188@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Pierre Abbat I am making a table of fu'ivla tarmi and have hit a snag. Is CVCCVVCV a valid fu'ivla tarmi? It could break into CV CCVVCV, where CCVVCV is a known valid fu'ivla tarmi, but the rules don't say anything about fu'ivla breaking into fu'ivla. phma