Subject: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 08:26:24 -0500 (EST)

On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Pierre Abbat wrote:

> I am making a table of fu'ivla tarmi and have hit a snag. Is CVCCVVCV a valid
> fu'ivla tarmi? It could break into CV CCVVCV, where CCVVCV is a known valid
> fu'ivla tarmi, but the rules don't say anything about fu'ivla breaking into
> fu'ivla.

The rules for valid fu'ivla are known to be incomplete.
It's clear to me, however, that anything which breaks up is not valid.

-- 
John Cowan [email-masked]
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
--Douglas Hofstadter