From richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com Tue Dec 12 15:14:09 2000
Return-Path: <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
X-Sender: richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_3); 12 Dec 2000 23:14:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 35767 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2000 23:14:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 Dec 2000 23:14:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO amersham.mail.uk.easynet.net) (195.40.1.45) by mta1 with SMTP; 12 Dec 2000 23:14:08 -0000
Received: from rrbcurnow.freeuk.com (tnt-5-134.easynet.co.uk [195.40.200.134]) by amersham.mail.uk.easynet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCA017534 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 23:14:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from richard by rrbcurnow.freeuk.com with local (Exim 2.02 #2) id 145ybh-000026-00 for lojban@egroups.com; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 23:13:13 +0000
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 23:13:13 +0000
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi
Message-ID: <20001212231313.D108@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
Reply-To: Richard Curnow <rpc@myself.com>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@egroups.com
References: <0012091808170I.20188@neofelis> <Pine.BSI.3.95.1001211082539.16632B-100000@locke.ccil.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i-nntp
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.1001211082539.16632B-100000@locke.ccil.org>; from cowan@ccil.org on Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 08:26:24AM -0500
From: Richard Curnow <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>

On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 08:26:24AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> The rules for valid fu'ivla are known to be incomplete.
> It's clear to me, however, that anything which breaks up is not valid.
> 

I was thinking about this word breaking issue again today, particularly
after the "iglu zbasu" example cited a couple of weeks ago. What
worries me is lujvo of the form CVVCCV followed by a gismu. For (a
contrived) example, the words "ci'ebra zbasu" would be stressed thus if
spoken

ci'Ebra zbAsu
^ ^
+------+---- stress

but consider how "ci'e brazbasu" could be spoken (given that cmavo can
be arbitrarily stressed)

ci'E brazbAsu
^ ^
+------+---- stress

i.e. the same! I'm not sure how these two cases can be distinguished in
the spoken language. What am I missing?

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Curnow rpc@myself.com
Weston-super-Mare
United Kingdom http://go.to/richard.curnow/


