From jcowan@reutershealth.com Thu Dec 14 07:09:43 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_3); 14 Dec 2000 15:09:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 7220 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2000 15:09:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Dec 2000 15:09:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 14 Dec 2000 15:09:42 -0000 Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03512; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:10:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3A38E267.1070809@reutershealth.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:08:23 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001107 Netscape6/6.0 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rob@twcny.rr.com, "lojban@onelist.com" Subject: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi References: <00121211423801.09168@neofelis> <20001212165002.B2817@twcny.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan Rob Speer wrote: >> CVC/CVCV: yes > > > Is that really possible? That breaks apart into a gismu form (CVC/CV) and a > cmavo form (CV). No, because the stress is on the second V, and a gismu can't be stressed on its second V. > Is that allowable provided that the CVC/CV part isn't a gismu? As a general matter, the morphology algorithms care only about structure, and are totally indifferent to whether a particular sequence is an assigned gismu or not. -- There is / one art || John Cowan no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein