From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Sat Dec 16 04:14:21 2000
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_3); 16 Dec 2000 12:14:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 88182 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2000 12:14:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 16 Dec 2000 12:14:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fj.egroups.com) (10.1.10.46) by mta2 with SMTP; 16 Dec 2000 12:14:20 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.10.94] by fj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 16 Dec 2000 12:14:20 -0000
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:14:18 -0000
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: detri
Message-ID: <91fmaq+qh4q@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <F1192ZhCl8aii08N8yx00000e20@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 695
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>

--- In lojban@egroups.com, "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@h...> wrote:
> 
> la xod cusku di'e
> 
> >but look at definition two:
> >
> > facki [ fak fa'i ] discover ; 'find'
> > x1 discovers/finds out x2 (du'u) about subject/object x3; x1
> > finds (fi) x3 (object)
> 
> The second definition is an attempt to salvage {facki} for
> the basic meaning of "find", but the x2 place is still there.
> 
> >ja'o mi facki fi le sfani befi'o nenri le mi stasu
> 
> It should be {*be* fi'o *se* nenri}, or just {*be* ne'i}, or {poi nenri}.

.i mutce pajmanci .i stidi lu mi facki fi pa/lo sfani fi'o nenri le mi stasu li'u .a lu mi facki fi pa/lo sfani ne'i le mi stasu li'u

.aulun.