From BestATN@aol.com Fri Jan 19 16:25:25 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: BestATN@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_1_2); 20 Jan 2001 00:25:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 18560 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2001 00:25:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 20 Jan 2001 00:25:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d04.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.36) by mta3 with SMTP; 20 Jan 2001 01:26:28 -0000 Received: from BestATN@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id a.de.f1c661e (8329) for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:25:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:25:16 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] Digest Number 692 To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 128 From: BestATN@aol.com In a message dated 1/19/2001 19:12:23 Eastern Standard Time, lojban@egroups.com writes: > > "wont" and "won't" are pronounced identically. > not around where i live, they're not. 'wont' (he's wont to do that = he's inclined to do that" with o as in pond "won't" (will not) with o as in bone steven lytle