From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Sat Jan 20 09:49:18 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_1_2); 20 Jan 2001 17:49:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 13311 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2001 17:49:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 20 Jan 2001 17:49:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta03-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.43) by mta2 with SMTP; 20 Jan 2001 17:49:17 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.252.12.138]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with SMTP id <20010120174915.YWIR10171.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for <lojban@egroups.com>; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:49:15 +0000
To: "Lojban@Egroups. Com" <lojban@egroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] speech synthesizer
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:48:16 -0000
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMAEKJDHAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <F187OjIL2jpWkfb81If00003d39@hotmail.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

> From: michael helsem [mailto:graywyvern@hotmail.com]
> >From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
> >I've been wondering: why _does_ lojban use ' instead of h?
> 
> so the anglophones don't forget it's not really pronounced like that.

>From what I can gather, Lojban /'/ and English /h/ are pronounced the 
same by almost everyone, though it is not utterly unheard of to
pronounce /'/ like English /T/. Lojbab has in the past rejected <h>
for /'/ on the grounds that /'/ is not (or not necessarily) pronounced
[h], but then nor is English /h/, for good phonetic reasons (e.g.
try saying [ihi]). The more kosher reason is that patterns of Cs and
Vs are very important to Lojban morphology, /'/ doesn't function as
a C, and (allegedly) people would tend to think of <h> as representing
a C.

In hindsight, the <'> was rather a mistake. Other less odious solutions 
were available and the <'> is disproportionately noisome to many
people. I believe that credit for dreaming up <'> goes to Lojbab...

--And.

