From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Wed Jan 31 15:17:57 2001
Return-Path: <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_2_1); 31 Jan 2001 23:17:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 37241 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2001 23:12:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 Jan 2001 23:12:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta1 with SMTP; 31 Jan 2001 23:12:22 -0000
Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id SAA24932; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:17:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:17:54 -0500
To: pycyn@aol.com
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] cmavo frequency?
Message-ID: <20010131181754.D20123@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
References: <b5.67f20bc.27a9f2be@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <b5.67f20bc.27a9f2be@aol.com>; from pycyn@aol.com on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 05:59:10PM -0500
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 05:59:10PM -0500, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 1/31/2001 4:33:01 PM Central Standard Time, 
> rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca writes:
> 
> 
> 
> > Subj: [lojban] cmavo frequency?
> > Date: 1/31/2001 4:33:01 PM Central Standard Time
> > From: rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Robin Lee Powell)
> > To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Is there a list of cmavo usage frequency, the way the gismu file has
> > frequency in it?
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> I doubt it. The frequency for the gismu is for the source words, not the 
> gismu themselves (I think) 

Since the most frequent word is 'sumti', I think you're wrong there. 8)

> and the correlation between cmavo and anything in source langauges is
> pretty iffy (not that that between gismu and anything in the sources
> is that clearcut). I don't think really accurate frequencies *in
> Lojban* are possible yet, given the instability of the corpus -- and
> its reliance on English et al.

Since this is just for flashcarding, it's a start.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP

