From xod@sixgirls.org Fri Feb 02 10:20:51 2001
Return-Path: <xod@erika.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@erika.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_2_1); 2 Feb 2001 18:20:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 52959 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2001 18:11:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 2 Feb 2001 18:11:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO erika.sixgirls.org) (209.208.150.50) by mta3 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 19:12:31 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by erika.sixgirls.org (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f12IBPG17934 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:11:25 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:11:25 -0500 (EST)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] fasnu?
In-Reply-To: <20010202130054.M19196@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.30.0102021306060.17424-100000@erika.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:16:36PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >
> > > What is the point of fasnu? Given that we have le nu, I can't imagine
> > > what I'd use it for, except maybe emphasis.
> >
> >
> >
> > nu:fasnu::si'o:sidbo
>
> Except that sidbo has 3 arguments, fasnu has only one. Given the
> existence of nu, what the heck's the point? And yes, I understand that
> 'nu' comes from 'fasnu', but that doesn't really change fasnu's
> pointlessness.


mi na jimpe le ka vajni fa le ni tergismu .i ko fanva lu mi viska le fasnu
li'u le su'u pilno zo nu




-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!


