From jcowan@reutershealth.com Fri Feb 02 13:38:49 2001
Return-Path: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_2_1); 2 Feb 2001 21:38:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 88946 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2001 21:29:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 2 Feb 2001 21:29:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 21:29:56 -0000
Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA07563; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:31:54 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3A7B26F5.6010709@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 16:30:29 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686; en-US; 0.7) Gecko/20010119
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Olivia <olivia@sonicblond.com>
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Reply, to whom?
References: <Pine.NEB.4.30.0102021552010.18832-100000@erika.sixgirls.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

Olivia wrote:

> a good way to alleviate this problem would be for the moderator to
> change the reply-to attribute of the list's posting settings to
> "All (replies go to all members of this group)".....

For why we don't do that, please read "Reply-To Munging
Considered Harmful" at http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein


