Subject: Re: [lojban] su'u

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 00:52:54

> > I don't know about meaningless, but it would be ambiguous.
> > {le nu mi klama} could mean {(le nu mi) klama} and
> > {le nu (mi klama}.
>
>As a fragment, maybe, but mi catlu le nu do klama is quite clear.
>
>-Robin

But no matter how many clear cases there are, as long as
there is one ambiguous case we have ambiguity.

do catlu be le nu mi klama

could parse as: do (catlu be le nu mi) klama
or as: do catlu be le nu (mi klama)

co'o mi'e xorxes

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.