Subject: Re: [lojban] su'u

From: Robin Lee Powell <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:50:12 -0500

On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 12:52:54AM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> 
> > > I don't know about meaningless, but it would be ambiguous.
> > > {le nu mi klama} could mean {(le nu mi) klama} and
> > > {le nu (mi klama}.
> >
> >As a fragment, maybe, but mi catlu le nu do klama is quite clear.
> >
> >-Robin
> 
> But no matter how many clear cases there are, as long as
> there is one ambiguous case we have ambiguity.
> 
> do catlu be le nu mi klama
> 
> could parse as: do (catlu be le nu mi) klama
> or as: do catlu be le nu (mi klama)

If that were true, then do catlu be le nu mi would parse, but it
doesn't, at least not in jbofi'e.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP