Subject: Re: [lojban] su'u

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 05:03:30

> > But no matter how many clear cases there are, as long as
> > there is one ambiguous case we have ambiguity.
> >
> > do catlu be le nu mi klama
> >
> > could parse as: do (catlu be le nu mi) klama
> > or as: do catlu be le nu (mi klama)
>
>If that were true, then do catlu be le nu mi would parse, but it
>doesn't, at least not in jbofi'e.
>
>-Robin

Of course it doesn't parse, and it shouldn't, that's what I was
saying. If xod's use of {le nu <sumti>} were accepted, it would
create ambiguity, that's why it is not acceptable, and it does
not parse.

co'o mi'e xorxes

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.