Subject: Re: [lojban] su'u

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 17:57:14 -0500 (EST)

On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> So you're saying that 'do catlu be le nu mi klama' is _not_ ambiguous as
> the grammar stands, and that 'le nu {sumti}' is illegal to make sure
> that it's not ambiguous?

Is there an alternate explanation I'm not seeing?

-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!