From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Sun Feb 04 09:16:09 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_2_1); 4 Feb 2001 17:16:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 51026 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2001 17:16:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 4 Feb 2001 17:16:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out.newmail.net) (212.150.51.26) by mta3 with SMTP; 4 Feb 2001 18:17:07 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.252.14.214]) by out.newmail.net ; Sun, 04 Feb 2001 19:10:01 +0200 To: "Robin Lee Powell" , Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: Reply, to whom? Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 17:09:04 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20010202173355.F15472@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-eGroups-From: "And Rosta" From: "And Rosta" > From: Robin Lee Powell [mailto:rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca] > On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 04:56:25PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > > > > The way you have this list set up, pine offers two options: to reply to > > the sender only, or to reply to everybody. "Everybody" means BOTH the > > original poster, and the list. > > > > Then use a less sucky mailer. http://www.mutt.org/ has a L key > specifically for mailing list replies. Which I sometimes forget to use. Outlook has the same defect that Invent Yourself reports for pine. What would a less sucky mailer than Outlook be? It must run under Windows 98 and be free. Eudora isn't a candidate as it without permission clandestinely fucks with stuff that's none of its business when you install it. --And.