Subject: Re: [lojban] su'u

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 11:44:09 -0500

Jorge Llambias wrote:

> do catlu be le nu mi klama
> 
> could parse as: do (catlu be le nu mi) klama

No, that is impossible. NU has to be followed by a bridi,
which must include a selbri.

> or as: do catlu be le nu (mi klama)

That's the only possible parse. To express the meaning of the
first case would require:

do catlu be le nu mi co'e cu klama

where cu could be replaced by be'o or kei.
-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein