From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Mon Feb 05 10:30:21 2001
Return-Path: <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_2_1); 5 Feb 2001 18:30:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 64334 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2001 18:30:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 5 Feb 2001 18:30:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta1 with SMTP; 5 Feb 2001 18:30:07 -0000
Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id NAA19008; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:35:52 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:35:52 -0500
To: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Reply, to whom?
Message-ID: <20010205133552.A18781@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Mail-Followup-To: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>, lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <20010202173355.F15472@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEBKDJAA.a.rosta@newmail.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEBKDJAA.a.rosta@newmail.net>; from arosta@uclan.ac.uk on Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 05:09:04PM -0000
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>

On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 05:09:04PM -0000, And Rosta wrote:
> > From: Robin Lee Powell [mailto:rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca]
> > On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 04:56:25PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > > 
> > > The way you have this list set up, pine offers two options: to reply to
> > > the sender only, or to reply to everybody. "Everybody" means BOTH the
> > > original poster, and the list. 
> > 
> > <religion>
> > 
> > Then use a less sucky mailer. http://www.mutt.org/ has a L key
> > specifically for mailing list replies. Which I sometimes forget to use.
> 
> Outlook has the same defect that Invent Yourself reports for pine.
> What would a less sucky mailer than Outlook be? It must run under
> Windows 98 

The second clause contradicts the first, but you might want to try
Netscape's mailer.

</religion>

-Robin

-- 
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP

