Subject: Re: [lojban] RE:su'u

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:41:58 -0500 (EST)

On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, John Cowan wrote:

> Trying to do this as "lo nu me la djudit. cekspir." doesn't work,
> because "la djudit. cekspir." lacks a referent. Whereas that trick does
> work when translating Sterne's _Tristram Shandy_ on the
> "corregiosity of Corregio".

According to this definition below, "me" pretty much converts le broda to
broda.

me [ ME ] sumti to selbri
convert sumti to selbri/tanru element; x1 is specific to
[sumti] in aspect x2

-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!