From pycyn@aol.com Thu Feb 08 18:10:24 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_3); 9 Feb 2001 02:10:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 90663 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2001 02:10:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 9 Feb 2001 02:10:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d06.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.38) by mta3 with SMTP; 9 Feb 2001 03:11:09 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id r.b2.10fc4cfb (4530) for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 21:10:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 21:10:00 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] afterthought emphasis? To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_b2.10fc4cfb.27b4ab78_boundary" Content-Disposition: Inline X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 10501 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_b2.10fc4cfb.27b4ab78_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/8/2001 4:15:27 PM Central Standard Time, rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca writes: > Any particular reason there seems to be no word for afterthough > emphasis? > We didn't think of it until afterwards. --part1_b2.10fc4cfb.27b4ab78_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/8/2001 4:15:27 PM Central Standard Time,
rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca writes:



Any particular reason there seems to be no word for afterthough
emphasis?




We didn't think of it until afterwards. --part1_b2.10fc4cfb.27b4ab78_boundary--