From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Sat Feb 10 02:22:53 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_3); 10 Feb 2001 10:22:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 57272 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2001 10:22:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Feb 2001 10:22:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO c9.egroups.com) (10.1.2.66) by mta1 with SMTP; 10 Feb 2001 10:22:53 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Received: from [10.1.10.120] by c9.egroups.com with NNFMP; 10 Feb 2001 10:22:53 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:22:50 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: kau Message-ID: <9634pq+lea1@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 715 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79 From: "A.W.T." --- In lojban@y..., "Jorge Llambias" wrote: > > la pier cusku di'e > > >Then of course there is "I know who goes to the store", meaning I know the > >person. That can't be "mi djuno le klama be le zarci", because le se djuno > >is a > >fact, not a person. But "mi djuno fi le klama be le zarci" isn't quite > >right > >either; that means "I know something about the one who goes to the store". > >So > >how do I say it? > > mi selsau le klama be le zarci stidi lu mi se slabu (selsau) da pe le klama be le zarci li'u co'o mi'e *la* .aulun. (BTW, don't you think that "la" is necessary with names to indicate that it isn't just the name/label etc. itself but a person referred to by it?)