From lojbab@lojban.org Sat Feb 10 04:15:27 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_3); 10 Feb 2001 12:15:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 9495 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2001 12:15:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Feb 2001 12:15:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-1.cais.net) (205.252.14.71) by mta3 with SMTP; 10 Feb 2001 13:16:31 -0000 Received: from bob.lojban.org (ppp31.net-A.cais.net [205.252.61.31]) by stmpy-1.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1ACFP464362 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 07:15:25 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010210071702.00b21d10@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 07:19:29 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] afterthought emphasis? In-Reply-To: <20010208164944.P18781@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" At 04:49 PM 02/08/2001 -0500, Robin Lee Powell wrote: >Any particular reason there seems to be no word for afterthough >emphasis? Any attitudinal/discursive in UI can be used for afterthought emphasis. ba'e was needed for forethought because Lojban had no means of forward marking corresponding to the attitudinals. lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org