From cowan@ccil.org Sat Feb 10 15:08:12 2001
Return-Path: <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_3); 10 Feb 2001 23:08:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 18316 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2001 23:08:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Feb 2001 23:08:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta3 with SMTP; 11 Feb 2001 00:09:09 -0000
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14Rj8b-0006FD-00; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:09:05 -0500
Subject: Re: [lojban] Imaginary worlds (was su'u)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.30.0102101520550.4202-100000@erika.sixgirls.org> from Invent Yourself at "Feb 10, 2001 03:33:10 pm"
To: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:09:05 -0500 (EST)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E14Rj8b-0006FD-00@mercury.ccil.org>
X-eGroups-From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>

Invent Yourself scripsit:

> Not only that but, since there is only one real world and any number of
> imaginary ones, how can you say that you would not be identical to your
> current "self" if you HAD been born to George Washington? Since we are
> departing from reality, we can construct an imaginary world by copying
> John Cowan's life and pasting it after George Washington.

That would not be about me; that would be a world in which George Washington's
son was a professional computer programmer.

> How can it be said that this is any less "realistic" than a world where
> John Cowan never married Gale McGhan?

Because I could have not married her (failed to take the English honors
class where we met, e.g.) and still have been *myself*.

Consider Kripke's table T, which is brown and made of wood. We can
have a possible world in which T is black because someone painted it.
But can we have a world in which T itself, that very table, was
made of another material? There might be some other table, T', which
served a corresponding function (sitting in my dining room, for
example), that was made of plastic. But that would not mean that T' = T.
Whereas T is T whether painted black or not. Thus Kripke and me.

-- 
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
--Douglas Hofstadter

