From nicholas@uci.edu Tue Feb 20 23:54:41 2001
Return-Path: <nicholas@uci.edu>
X-Sender: nicholas@uci.edu
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 21 Feb 2001 07:54:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 38669 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 07:54:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Feb 2001 07:54:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO e4e.oac.uci.edu) (128.200.222.10) by mta2 with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 07:54:38 -0000
Received: from [128.195.187.85] (dialin53c-75.ppp.uci.edu [128.195.187.85]) by e4e.oac.uci.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA20042 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 23:54:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender: nicholas@e4e.oac.uci.edu
Message-Id: <v03007803b6b754957a54@[128.195.186.97]>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GS4.4.02.10102171904050.22835-100000@aurora>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010216215932.00af0130@127.0.0.1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:02:05 -0800
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] nilbroda
From: Nick Nicholas <nicholas@uci.edu>

>From: Peter Moulder <reiter@netspace.net.au>
>Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 19:06:41 +1100 (EST)

>What about "variadic" selbri like "(nil)du"? How does one know whether
>the last sumti belongs to ni or du?

Ouch. Very good point. You either
(a) give up and don't admit nildu'o as a lujvo (which is no good);
(b) make nildu'o an exception, and have the ni2 precede the arguments of
du'o --- which leads to untold confusion;
(c) leave it as it stands, which is disastrous.

One would say at this point that usage and context would always sort this
out. To which I answer that if I want English, I know where to find it. If
a lujvo has an ambiguous place structure, it has no business being a lujvo.
(Which would, if anything, go back to (a).)

I knew there was a reason I wanted those ni2 and traji4 in second position.
Oh well.

.i .ua ko seka'i mi rinsa lemi gugde

Nick Nicholas, Thesaurus Linguae Graecae. nicholas@uci.edu
www.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis
"All the nations also under his dominion were filled with joy and
inexpressible gladness at not being even for a moment deprived of the
benefits of a well ordered government."
--- Eusebius of Caesaria on the accession of Constantine I.



