Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: Orcutt (again?!)

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:27:03 -0500

And Rosta wrote:

> Still, I remain to be convinced, and it is perfectly possible (and in fact true)
> that ASH and EPAMINONDAS are words that are familiar (se slabu) to me yet that
> have meanings that I know only a small incomplete and inadequate portion of.

BTW, the canonical Kripke example of this is FEYNMAN and GELL-MANN.
One may know that FEYNMAN refers to a famous physicist, and yet be
completely unable to distinguish him from the referent of GELL-MANN
by any specific properties (other than the trivial ones "named
F." and "named G.-M."). Nevertheless one then knows that Feynman is not
Gell-Mann.

IMAO, an Englishman who doesn't know Oak, Ash, and Thorn had better
rectify himself at once. As an aid to this, here are some pictures:
http://sunsite.sut.ac.jp/pub/academic/medicine/alternative-healthcare/herbal-medicine/pictures/e-i/fraxinus-excelsior-1.jpg
http://sunsite.sut.ac.jp/pub/academic/medicine/alternative-healthcare/herbal-medicine/pictures/e-i/fraxinus-excelsior.jpg
http://sunsite.sut.ac.jp/pub/academic/medicine/alternative-healthcare/herbal-medicine/pictures/e-i/fraxinus-excelsior-2.jpg

This particular ash tree is somewhere in London, presumably in a park.
-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein