From robin@BILKENT.EDU.TR Wed Feb 21 14:43:50 2001
Return-Path: <robin@Bilkent.EDU.TR>
X-Sender: robin@Bilkent.EDU.TR
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 21 Feb 2001 22:43:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 25455 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 22:31:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Feb 2001 22:31:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO firat.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr) (139.179.10.13) by mta2 with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 22:31:50 -0000
Received: from bilkent.edu.tr (IDENT:robin@slip2.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.70.12]) by firat.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1LMaj005855 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:36:45 +0200 (EET)
Sender: robin@Bilkent.EDU.TR
Message-ID: <3A9443AD.BF14ED52@bilkent.edu.tr>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:39:41 +0200
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdk i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] RE:su'u
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010221151359.00b9f3d0@127.0.0.1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: robin <robin@BILKENT.EDU.TR>

"Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" wrote:
> 
> At 05:08 PM 02/21/2001 +0000, And Rosta wrote:
> >Nor can it be laziness, because intellectually, rather than digitally,
> >zei lujvo are the easier option.
> 
> But digital laziness exceeds intellectual laziness among the programmer
> types that frequent Lojbanistan.

Which is why a lot of cmavo remind me of UNIX commands!

Rather off-topic, here's an acronymical conundrum I set my students:

Why do UN and IRA take a definite article, while UNESCO and ETA do not?

Some of the students got it: none of my colleagues did.

co'o mi'e robin.