From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Thu Feb 22 16:38:09 2001
Return-Path: <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 23 Feb 2001 00:37:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 41129 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2001 00:37:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 23 Feb 2001 00:37:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta1 with SMTP; 23 Feb 2001 00:37:06 -0000
Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id TAA02435; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:43:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:43:17 -0500
To: Jorge Llambias <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] set mechanics
Message-ID: <20010222194316.A2351@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Mail-Followup-To: Jorge Llambias <jjllambias@hotmail.com>, lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <F69g9uV54Ogddu5qE8D0001e542@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <F69g9uV54Ogddu5qE8D0001e542@hotmail.com>; from jjllambias@hotmail.com on Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:20:48AM +0000
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>

On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:20:48AM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> 
> >From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
> >
> >Does anyone interpret:
> >
> >mi ce do ku'a na'e bo do
> >
> >as resulting in anything other than the set with the single element
> >'mi'?
> 
> Strictly that is the intersection of the set {mi,do} with
> something that would not normally be a set. "Someone/thing other
> than you" is not really the complement of the one member set {do}.
> Perhaps:
> 
> mi ce do ku'a lu'i ro na'e bo do
> 
> You need a set to intersect with another set.

Ah, yes. I like that better. Or maybe:

mi ce do ku'a na'e bo lu'i do

Think I like that best so far.

> (I don't understand how {to'e} could possibly work here.)

'polar opposite' sounds like it would generate the inverse when applied
to a set to me.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP

