From lojbab@lojban.org Thu Feb 22 18:11:46 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 23 Feb 2001 02:10:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 46063 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2001 02:10:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 23 Feb 2001 02:10:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-1.cais.net) (205.252.14.71) by mta2 with SMTP; 23 Feb 2001 02:10:56 -0000 Received: from bob.lojban.org ([209.8.89.72]) by stmpy-1.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1N2Ast40257 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:10:55 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010222211250.00afec40@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:14:43 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] How odd. In-Reply-To: <20010222205852.E2351@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" At 08:58 PM 02/22/2001 -0500, Robin Lee Powell wrote: >I notice that citno has no antonym. Seems odd. It did. When we created the gismu list we considered the antonym to be a special case of slabu. Others have argued that this approach is malglico, and have used to'ercitno for the antonym. Usage has pretty much carried the day for that viewpoint. lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org